From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw@Stanford.EDU>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: cpplib: Nix -g3.
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010114195904.B1001@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
References: <20010109233506.C7013@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20010109155204.A2032@wolery.stanford.edu> <20010110000706.C10605@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20010110041336.V1120@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20010110211105.B21420@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20010110154606.R2032@wolery.stanford.edu> <20010110235853.G21420@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20010111005714.V2032@wolery.stanford.edu> <20010111185440.I32364@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <u9wvbyrsm7.fsf@casey.cambridge.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-01/msg00898.html

Jason Merrill wrote:-

> None of the debugging backends actually use this information, so I wouldn't
> bother if it's at all inconvenient.

It's already doing it that way.  The # 1 stuff comes out of cppmain.c
naturally without extra code :-) The only question was should the
lines be # 0, but if nothing uses it that can wait until something
does.

Neil.