public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: aoliva@redhat.com
Cc: wilson@cygnus.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: C++ ptrmemfun break if FUNCTION_BOUNDARY < 2 *BITS_PER_UNIT
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010410092712A.mitchell@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <orofu6xfro.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

I think this all makes sense.

I should have thought of this issue when implementing the new ABI;
somehow, it didn't occur to me.

I would sugest that if you're going to use an enum to represent
different choices about representation here (which seems reasonable)
that you have the TARGET_ macro evaluate to an enum, rather than a
boolean.  That would be simpler.  Have it default to
ptrmemfunc_vbit_in_pfn in defaults.h, and then you can eliminate the
conditional compilation in decl.c.

Thank you for taking on the task of fixing the problem.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-04-10  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-06  3:14 C++ ptrmemfun break if FUNCTION_BOUNDARY < 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT Alexandre Oliva
2001-04-06 10:53 ` Neil Booth
2001-04-06 11:03   ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-04-07  4:52   ` Richard Earnshaw
2001-04-07 10:12     ` Dave Korn
2001-04-06 13:05 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-06 14:45   ` DJ Delorie
2001-04-09  8:19   ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-04-09 12:28     ` Joern Rennecke
2001-04-09 13:12       ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-04-09 13:43         ` Joern Rennecke
2001-04-18  5:48         ` Richard Earnshaw
2001-04-18 12:11           ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-04-10  9:27     ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2001-04-17 10:38     ` Andrew Cagney
2001-04-17 13:02       ` Daniel Berlin
2001-05-16  4:53         ` Jason Merrill
2001-05-16  7:18           ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-06  3:34 dewar
2001-04-06  4:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-04-06  6:02 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-04-06  4:49 dewar
2001-04-06  5:00 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-04-06  5:05 dewar
2001-04-06  5:10 ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010410092712A.mitchell@codesourcery.com \
    --to=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=wilson@cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).