From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
To: dan@cgsoftware.com, Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, wilson@cygnus.com, schwab@suse.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 21:07:00 -0000
Message-id: <200104130407.f3D473o14019@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <m2bsq2dhzv.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <20010411183411J.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <m2wv8qby1j.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <20010411211618B.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <m2k84qbuop.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <200104121926.f3CJQj909281@porkchop.redhat.com> <m2bsq1zshg.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg00582.html

(restating some stuff from private mail)

Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware wrote:
>Umm, actually, are you sure you applied the patch?
>
>The abort location should be moved down a few lines, yet it's claiming
>an ICE at the exact same location it did before (there is no other
>abort() in that routine).

Yup, I did apply the patch; I can confirm with this patch in head
I can build libstdc++-v3 OK; but it still fails for me on the
3.0 branch in the same place.

Bill