From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000.c ELF bits inclusion 
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 20:52:00 -0000
Message-id: <200105030352.XAA23234@makai.watson.ibm.com>
References: <20010502203158.A4873@dragon.nuxi.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00088.html

	Isn't this a question of whether config/svr4.h assumes to much?

	Why is the right solution to change rs6000.c?  Maybe it is or
maybe it isn't.  To me this is a broader design question than FreeBSD
relying directly upon elfos.h and sweeping the changes under the rug.

	config/freebsd.h is duplicating pieces of config/svr4.h.  This
causes a maintenance problem.  Is there no way to separate the
system-specific pieces of config/svr4.h from the ABI-specific pieces so
that FreeBSD could shared the latter with other SVR4-based system?

David