From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: zackw@stanford.edu, dj@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Another RFC: regex in libiberty
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:39:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010608103957.A6471@lucon.org>
References: <9003-Fri08Jun2001100651+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20010608095932.S979@stanford.edu> <20010608100532.B5728@lucon.org> <4098-Fri08Jun2001202600+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00404.html

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:26:00PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > 
> > I have been telling people that you should use regex.c in glibc if
> > all possible if you are using gnu-regex. Every package which uses
> > gnu-regex should have a configuration option not to use the included
> > gnu-regex.
> 
> Sed does have such an option (I used it to build the binary with
> Spencer's regex which is the standard regex included in the DJGPP
> library).

Glad to hear that. It makes even more senses when gnu-regex is the
standard regex in the system C library.


H.J.