From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 23:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <200107090659.IAA26529@quatramaran.ens.fr>
References: <20010705163930.A29149@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20010707130928.A2761@redhat.com> <20010707234148.C10109@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <200107082128.f68LS4x08156@penguin.transmeta.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00580.html

In article < 200107082128.f68LS4x08156@penguin.transmeta.com > you write:
>gcc-3.0 already gets complaints for generating slower and more bloated
>code than previous gcc releases. That should tell people something.

Try not to jumble things together, please. The ix86 alignment properties
is nothing new at all. You can't really use the `gcc 3.0 is slower 
than previous releases' argument as a lever against it.

If gcc 3.0 is a problem for you, please dig deeper, and get the stack
alignment issues in a separate thread.