From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@redhat.com>
To: jh@suse.cz (Jan Hubicka)
Cc: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (Toon Moene), gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: associative law in combine
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200107172259.f6HMxYU31134@phal.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010717212125.P5166@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
>
> > Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > > Sure, but not in fold-CONST.c :-)
> > > OK, what is the apropriate place for that then? We simply need it to be done
> > > at tree level. It is FOLD-const after all :)
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't know.
> >
> > Perhaps just asking it on the list is best.
> OK, so to speak loud - where is the proper place to convert
> a/b/c to a/(b*c) at tree level. fold-const or some other?
Only if b and c are constants, the operations are floating point, and
b can be multiplied with c without loss of precision or overflow.
Or if b and/or c is a power of two, and b can be multiplied with c without
overflow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-17 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010716224423.F29145@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <3B547DF4.7F39BF61@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
[not found] ` <20010717200629.E5166@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <3B5489F1.54DE59CE@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
[not found] ` <20010717205837.I5166@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <3B548CBF.DDD59F97@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
[not found] ` <20010717211516.N5166@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <3B548FAA.E174E765@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
2001-07-17 12:23 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-17 15:41 ` Dima Volodin
2001-07-17 15:59 ` Joern Rennecke [this message]
2001-07-18 1:01 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-18 1:47 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Jan Hubicka
2001-07-28 23:04 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 6:33 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 10:18 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 10:26 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 12:11 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 12:17 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 10:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-18 11:30 ` associative law in combine Joern Rennecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200107172259.f6HMxYU31134@phal.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=amylaar@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jh@suse.cz \
--cc=toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).