From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.COM>
To: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac dot@(Gerald Pfeifer)
Cc: jbuck@synopsys.com (Joe Buck), mark@codesourcery.com (Mark Mitchell), gcc@gcc.gnu.org (gcc@gcc.gnu.org)
Subject: Re: C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:09:00 -0000
Message-id: <200107241708.KAA08101@atrus.synopsys.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0107241612160.81646-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg01581.html

> I'm rather sure, though, that g++ is not generating efficient code for
> complicated, nested STL and STL-like structures in the presence of
> libstdc++-v3 (iterators are now classes instead of pointers).

But the classes have one member, so we should still be getting equivalent
code, provided that we get ADDRESSOF working as well as it did in 2.95.x.