From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@redhat.com>
To: aoliva@redhat.com (Alexandre Oliva)
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), dewar@gnat.com, moshier@moshier.ne.mediaone.net, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, tprince@computer.org
Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 19:08:00 -0000
Message-id: <200107310208.f6V285508812@phal.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <orr8uyf609.fsf@feijoada.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg02043.html

> But we could use new tokens, say (( )) and ((( ))) to mark expressions
> the preprocessor and the compiler shouldn't muck up with.  It would

It's hard to distinguish an opening (( from two opening (s that
are closes separately, e.g.:

a*((b+c)*d)

OTOH, you could re-use (abuse) statement expressions for this purpose:

({a+b;})*c