From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
To: rth@redhat.com (Richard Henderson)
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Simple returns are broken in gcc 3.X
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 08:03:00 -0000
Message-id: <200107311439.f6VEdxUK010010@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
References: <20010730231539.A3702@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg02108.html

> Err, yes it would.  There's another bit in expand_function_end.

Isn't that bit necessary if there isn't an epilogue?

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)