public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@redhat.com>
To: rth@redhat.com (Richard Henderson)
Cc: jh@suse.cz (Jan Hubicka),
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, patches@x86-64.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: BB duplication code
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200108222304.f7MN4mR04140@phal.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010822121440.H29601@redhat.com>

> In the case of JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION, yes, you absolutely cannot
> share the table.  This is used by targets that use pc-relative addressing
> from the jump instruction to the table.  VAX is the most extreme example
> in that the entire table is an argument to the instruction.

This is target-dependent.  Some targets just put the jump table in the text
section because the linker can't handle cross-section differences, and
they use differences (either always or for pic / PIC).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-08-22 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-22 11:29 Jan Hubicka
2001-08-22 12:14 ` Richard Henderson
2001-08-22 12:27   ` Jan Hubicka
2001-08-22 13:04     ` Richard Henderson
2001-08-23  6:44       ` Jan Hubicka
2001-08-23 16:19         ` Richard Henderson
2001-08-24  6:35           ` Jan Hubicka
2001-09-07 20:34         ` Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Michael Hayes
2001-09-07 22:23           ` Daniel Berlin
2001-09-08  9:15             ` Jan Hubicka
2001-09-08  8:57           ` Jan Hubicka
2001-09-08 14:00             ` Daniel Berlin
2001-09-08  9:09           ` Jan Hubicka
2001-09-08 16:56             ` Michael Hayes
2001-09-09  1:23               ` Jan Hubicka
2001-09-26 17:27               ` Jan Hubicka
2001-09-08  9:33           ` Jan Hubicka
2001-09-19 22:23           ` Joern Rennecke
2001-09-21 19:11             ` Michael Hayes
2001-09-21 21:16               ` Joern Rennecke
2001-09-23  4:29                 ` Michael Hayes
2001-09-24  4:34                   ` Jan Hubicka
2001-09-22 10:17           ` Jan Hubicka
2001-08-22 16:04   ` Joern Rennecke [this message]
2001-08-22 16:44     ` RFC: BB duplication code Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200108222304.f7MN4mR04140@phal.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=amylaar@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jh@suse.cz \
    --cc=patches@x86-64.org \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).