From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mike stump To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, patrick.mackinlay@kjv.com.au Subject: Re: unwind-dw2-fde.[ch] Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 19:18:00 -0000 Message-id: <200109070217.TAA23797@kankakee.wrs.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00189.html > From: "Mackinlay, Patrick" > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:06:42 +0800 > In my work trying to build gcc with an old Intergraph InterPro as a host, > I've run into a problem with file name length with two of the files added to > the gcc-3.0 (that weren't a problem with 2.95.3). The two files > (unwind-dw2-fde.c and unwind-dw2-fde.h) unfortunately overflow the > 14-character max filename length of the host OS, leaving only one after a > full tar -xf, and causing a build dependency problem later on. > Although there are other >14 character filenames produced at various times > (the host descriptor, in fact, is clipper-intergraph-clix), these have not > yet caused a problem. Would it be too much to ask that the files in question > could have their filenames shortened? It seems like a small price to pay to > allow future build success on these older Unixen... Would building on an nfs volume fix this problem? If it does, that's what I'd recommend. If not, I'd recommend building via a cross compiler. Should be fairly trivial, see the documentation for instructions.