From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>
To: mrs@windriver.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS policy question
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:30:00 -0000
Message-id: <200109182326.f8INQiM16772@quatramaran.ens.fr>
References: <200109180038.RAA27823@kankakee.wrs.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00735.html

In article < 200109180038.RAA27823@kankakee.wrs.com > you write:
>would be OK by the sony_news/mips maintainer.  My wording also makes
>it clear that an FreeBSD maintainer can change the FreeBSD make file
>fragments, but not the Linux parts of the x86 files.  Adding a

I'm looking at the 3.0.1 MAINTAINER list. There is no FreeBSD maintainer,
nor a Linux maintainer, nor an OpenBSD maintainer.

In fact, considering the current discussion, what's the interpretation of
`port' ? I don't think it's unnatural to consider it might mean `processor'
(current interpretation) but may also mean `os' or `processor+os'.

The area is fairly simple to define.

If I don't presume too much, I would like to be relisted a maintainer for
the OpenBSD ports (the OpenBSD specific part, of course, by your rules).