From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: rth@redhat.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: host_integerp vs [] decls
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:28:00 -0000
Message-id: <200109210028.UAA14830@greed.delorie.com>
References: <200109141954.PAA09127@greed.delorie.com> <20010914144112.B15655@redhat.com> <200109191921.PAA10620@greed.delorie.com> <20010919123743.A32396@redhat.com> <200109192009.QAA15781@greed.delorie.com> <20010919133611.A32428@redhat.com> <200109200110.VAA19338@greed.delorie.com> <20010920140613.A867@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00824.html

> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:10:02PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > 	* c-typeck.c (really_start_incremental_init): Discriminate
> > 	between zero-length arrays and flexible arrays.
> > 	(push_init_level): Detect zero-length arrays and handle them
> > 	like fixed-sized arrays.
> > 	* expr.c (store_constructor): Handle zero-length arrays and
> > 	flexible arrays correctly.
> > 	* doc/extend.texi: Update zero-length array notes.
> 
> Ok, except, 
> 
> > 	* gcc.dg/array-4.c: Likewise, and don't verify the zero-length
> > 	array.
> 
> Just delete the zero-length bits here.

Ok.  Done.  Thanks!