From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: shebs@apple.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Stray definitions of xmalloc and friends?
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 18:14:00 -0000
Message-id: <200110100114.f9A1ENe08175@greed.delorie.com>
References: <3BC399D9.2F09B058@apple.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00625.html

> While going through and whacking uses of "register", I noticed
> that there are three apparently-leftover definitions of xmalloc and
> other libiberty functions, in gencheck.c, gengenrtl.c, and
> gensupport.c.  No longer any reason to keep these alive, right?

The gen* programs aren't linked with libiberty, because they run on
the build machine and we don't yet build a build-libiberty (see my
proposal about that, though).  Thus, they must continue to provide
their own xmalloc et al functions.