From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gordon Sadler To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Ada] Partial bootstrap success on Debian/x86 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:45:00 -0000 Message-id: <20011011134835.A29607@debian-home> References: <87g08rk7zm.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00725.html On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 02:14:05PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > I'm glad to report that current CVS is close to building > out-of-the-box on Debian (x86 architecture, not-too-current sid), > using the Debian gnat package (which includes a driver called > "gnatgcc") and the C compiler of GCC 2.95.4 20010721 (Debian > prerelease). The stage3 binaries seems to be able to compile > correctly most of my code, at least my test cases work. ;-) > > Only the xnmake problem reported earlier and the debug information > comparison failures remain. > After reading most of the various threads relating to ada being added to cvs head, I've tried various ways to bootstrap, nothing succeeds as of now. I use Debian unstable(updated daily) and use CC=gnatgcc in my build scripts. I used gnatmake to make xtreeprs xsinfo xnmake xeinfo and place them in /usr/local/bin. I try to bootstrap daily and have seen various different errors every day. Today's error: gnatgcc -c -DIN_GCC -g -O2 -march=i686 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -I. -I/usr/src/cvs/gcc/gcc -I/usr/src/cvs/gcc/gcc/. -I/usr/src/cvs/gcc/gcc/config -I/usr/src/cvs/gcc/gcc/../include /usr/src/cvs/gcc/gcc/gengenrtl.c cc1: Invalid option `-Wno-long-long' In file included from /usr/include/unistd.h:500, from /usr/src/cvs/gcc/gcc/system.h:157, from /usr/src/cvs/gcc/gcc/gengenrtl.c:23: /usr/include/bits/confname.h:565: warning: comma at end of enumerator list make[2]: *** [gengenrtl.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/build/gcc/gcc' make[1]: *** [stage2_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/build/gcc/gcc' make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 Any pointers on your method of success? -- Gordon Sadler