Re: I really need help!

[Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>]

Did you try -fomit-frame-pointer ?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:47:49PM -0700, Gavin Li wrote:
> I am not sure if I should send this mail to here.
> 
> I use gcc (2.95.3) compile a file which include a
> function start(), 
> the C file is:
> /* Hardware boot loader */
> void start(void)
> {
> 	asm ("movl %esp, 0x5000");
> 	for (;;)
> 	{
>         	/* do whatever I want, such as call foo() */
> 		foo();
> 	}
> }
> foo()
> {
>    ...
> }
> 
> the command line used to compile :
> gcc -O3 -nostdlib -e start -o bootldr.out bootldr.c
> objdump -d bootldr.out > bootldr.asm
> 
> the ASM output is:
> 	push %ebp
> 	mov  %esp, %ebp
> 	mpv  %esp, 0x5000
> 	...
> 
> 
> My question is how can I get ride of the first two ASM
> instructions? I want the compiler to compile my
> inlined ASM instruction as the first instruction in
> the start() function, and the other function just as
> general output.
>  
> My reason that I want to get ride of those instruction
> si:
>    I provided -e start to tell compiler that program
> should start run from start(). There is no other
> function will call this start(), It is the first
> function which was run after power on. The first two
> ASM instructions are useless. Seriosly, they are
> harmful!!!
> Because when an embedded system power on, it runs from
> start(), the stack pointer is undefined at this time,
> it may points to some place where do NOT have memory
> at all! so the push instruction will generate
> exception! So, I need the compiler to generate start()
> which the first instruction is my inline assembler!
>     I checked the GCC online manual, but I can't find
> how to make gcc works as what I want.
>     Anyone who can tell me how to do that?
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> 
> Gavin
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>