* Doing regular trunk->ast-optimizer-branch merges?
@ 2001-10-17 7:44 Diego Novillo
2001-10-18 14:39 ` Nathan Sidwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Diego Novillo @ 2001-10-17 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Sidwell; +Cc: gcc
Nathan,
Since we are not going to be merging the tree SSA framework into
the trunk just yet, I would like to start doing merges from the
trunk into the AST branch on a regular basis.
We are going to start implementing optimizations soon and I would
like to make sure a future merge into the trunk will go smoothly.
Now, I remember that you wanted to work on a stable branch, so
maybe it would be better if we just create a new branch for the
tree SSA work?
Thanks. Diego.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Doing regular trunk->ast-optimizer-branch merges?
2001-10-18 14:39 ` Nathan Sidwell
@ 2001-10-18 9:05 ` Diego Novillo
2001-10-19 9:29 ` Diego Novillo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Diego Novillo @ 2001-10-18 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Sidwell; +Cc: gcc
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> As you've probably noticed, I've not done any work on that branch for a
> while now. You've been using it much more than me, so merge away. If
> it becomes a problem, I'm sure we can work something out.
>
Sounds good. I'll try to do a merge tonight.
Thanks. Diego.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Doing regular trunk->ast-optimizer-branch merges?
2001-10-17 7:44 Doing regular trunk->ast-optimizer-branch merges? Diego Novillo
@ 2001-10-18 14:39 ` Nathan Sidwell
2001-10-18 9:05 ` Diego Novillo
2001-10-19 9:29 ` Diego Novillo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2001-10-18 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Diego Novillo; +Cc: gcc
Diego Novillo wrote:
> Now, I remember that you wanted to work on a stable branch, so
> maybe it would be better if we just create a new branch for the
> tree SSA work?
As you've probably noticed, I've not done any work on that branch for a
while now. You've been using it much more than me, so merge away. If
it becomes a problem, I'm sure we can work something out.
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Doing regular trunk->ast-optimizer-branch merges?
2001-10-18 14:39 ` Nathan Sidwell
2001-10-18 9:05 ` Diego Novillo
@ 2001-10-19 9:29 ` Diego Novillo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Diego Novillo @ 2001-10-19 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Sidwell; +Cc: gcc
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Now, I remember that you wanted to work on a stable branch, so
> > maybe it would be better if we just create a new branch for the
> > tree SSA work?
>
> As you've probably noticed, I've not done any work on that branch for a
> while now. You've been using it much more than me, so merge away. If
> it becomes a problem, I'm sure we can work something out.
>
Well, I got started with the merge but I won't be able to fix all
the conflicts today. Since I won't be able to work on this for
a while, it'll have to wait a bit longer.
Diego.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-19 9:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-17 7:44 Doing regular trunk->ast-optimizer-branch merges? Diego Novillo
2001-10-18 14:39 ` Nathan Sidwell
2001-10-18 9:05 ` Diego Novillo
2001-10-19 9:29 ` Diego Novillo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).