From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
Cc: Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem with recent fixes in loop_iterations ?
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20011127135333.C30114@redhat.com>
References: <kthergm8fi.fsf@berlin.int.act-europe.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg01390.html
Message-ID: <20011127135300.KNt3nUwOcREavGd2Dm39I9XhTDCKWcSflPPP0XCDBf8@z>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:26:41PM +0100, Olivier Hainque wrote:
>  Is having this kind of insn here something expected never to happen ... or
>  should the test be refined, or ... ?

The test must be refined a good deal to deal with a switch statement.
Probably you should notice the ADDR_VEC | ADDR_DIFF_VEC and give up.


r~