From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6639 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2001 20:45:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6608 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2001 20:45:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.demon.co.uk) (158.152.184.26) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2001 20:45:53 -0000 Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 169Bb9-0000YJ-00; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:46:27 +0000 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:24:00 -0000 From: Neil Booth To: Ziemowit Laski Cc: Aldy Hernandez , Joe Buck , Mark Mitchell , "Joseph S. Myers" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Input Stream Rewriting (Was: Target-specific Front-Ends?) Message-ID: <20011128204626.B32131@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> References: <20011128190634.B1018@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg01005.txt.bz2 Ziemowit Laski wrote:- > Actually, my vote would be to place the functionality in the lexical > analyzer in cpplib (so that it would also be present in the stand-alone > CPP), > where essentially you rewrite the token stream right before it comes out. That gets a very big thumbs down from me. I don't want any more extraneous stuff added to CPP. Neil. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Booth To: Ziemowit Laski Cc: Aldy Hernandez , Joe Buck , Mark Mitchell , "Joseph S. Myers" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Input Stream Rewriting (Was: Target-specific Front-Ends?) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011128204626.B32131@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> References: <20011128190634.B1018@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg01506.html Message-ID: <20011128124500.qqqeQTIygw_YdN2ERuKQaiFGgDeWGfgW1Sf6ijeXluQ@z> Ziemowit Laski wrote:- > Actually, my vote would be to place the functionality in the lexical > analyzer in cpplib (so that it would also be present in the stand-alone > CPP), > where essentially you rewrite the token stream right before it comes out. That gets a very big thumbs down from me. I don't want any more extraneous stuff added to CPP. Neil.