From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11245 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2001 17:53:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10323 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2001 17:52:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dot.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.224) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2001 17:52:18 -0000 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fATHq8X31436; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:52:08 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.cygnus.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:13:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Olivier Hainque Cc: Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Problem with recent fixes in loop_iterations ? Message-ID: <20011129095208.C31422@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Olivier Hainque , Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20011127135333.C30114@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from hainque@ACT-Europe.FR on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:35:22AM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg01066.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:35:22AM +0100, Olivier Hainque wrote: > This part of the compiler is not very familiar to me. By give up, you mean > returning 0... Yes. r~ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Henderson To: Olivier Hainque Cc: Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Problem with recent fixes in loop_iterations ? Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011129095208.C31422@redhat.com> References: <20011127135333.C30114@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg01567.html Message-ID: <20011129095300.P2Yfzhxrl-Oqxbr9WmREgh73PdtMq0ZzGrTqN0oJv60@z> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:35:22AM +0100, Olivier Hainque wrote: > This part of the compiler is not very familiar to me. By give up, you mean > returning 0... Yes. r~