From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42154-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19587 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2001 23:10:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19503 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 23:10:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dot.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.224)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 23:10:14 -0000
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by dot.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fB3NA4T07318;
	Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:10:04 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: dot.cygnus.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 15:10:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Simple question about FUNCTION_DECL.
Message-ID: <20011203151004.E7284@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
References: <20011203165213.A19094@disaster.jaj.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20011203165213.A19094@disaster.jaj.com>; from pedwards@disaster.jaj.com on Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 04:52:13PM -0500
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 04:52:13PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> Given a CALL_EXPR, is it possible to get the corresponding FUNCTION_DECL
> from it, i.e., the inverse of build_x_function_call?

get_callee_fndecl.


r~