From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 962 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2001 21:48:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 808 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 21:48:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO disaster.jaj.com) (209.64.26.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 21:48:08 -0000 Received: (from pedwards@localhost) by disaster.jaj.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA19099 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 16:52:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 13:48:00 -0000 From: Phil Edwards To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Simple question about FUNCTION_DECL. Message-ID: <20011203165213.A19094@disaster.jaj.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 Given a CALL_EXPR, is it possible to get the corresponding FUNCTION_DECL from it, i.e., the inverse of build_x_function_call? -- If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams