From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42157-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10991 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2001 23:40:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10861 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 23:40:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wrs.com) (147.11.1.11)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 23:40:50 -0000
Received: from kankakee.wrs.com (kankakee [147.11.37.13])
	by mail.wrs.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA06570;
	Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:39:49 -0800 (PST)
From: mike stump <mrs@windriver.com>
Received: (from mrs@localhost)
	by kankakee.wrs.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.0) id PAA28919;
	Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 15:40:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200112032340.PAA28919@kankakee.wrs.com>
To: jbuck@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: fix for PR 4447: is this really correct?
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2

> From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
> To: mrs@windriver.com (mike stump)
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 16:14:30 -0800 (PST)
> Cc: jbuck@synopsys.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net

> I wrote:
> > > I'd prefer to have neither the ICE nor the ABI breakage, but I'd
> > > prefer the latter to the former.

> However, it turns out that the strange mangling is exactly what the
> ABI specifies, according to Kriang, so the issue is moot.

Ok, I withdraw all my comments.  Certainly more is going on than I
ever imagined.