From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31498 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2001 18:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31463 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 18:24:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dot.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.224) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2001 18:24:56 -0000 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fB4IOr807810; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:24:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.cygnus.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 10:24:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Eric Christopher Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Discussion: Removal of mips half-pic Message-ID: <20011204102453.A7807@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Eric Christopher , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <1007455899.26911.8.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1007455899.26911.8.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com>; from echristo@redhat.com on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 12:51:36AM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00138.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 12:51:36AM -0800, Eric Christopher wrote: > I thought I'd throw this out here since as far as I can tell it isn't > used anymore, but other comments are welcome. I'm thinking of removing > the half-pic support from the mips backend. I think the discussion should be about half-pic across the entire compiler. Does anyone know if any such OSF/1 systems are still live? (And before anyone gets confused that's OSF/1 as distributed by OSF, not OSF/1 nee DU nee Tru64 as distributed by Digital.) r~