public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/stabs reader] Fix v3 duplicate constructors problem
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 08:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011204115920.A8635@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wvl7ks3ce08.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 01:26:47PM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net> writes:
> 
> > I would like gdb to demangle different names differently.
> 
> Which brings me to a question: Why don't we demangle them differently?
> Currently, flag_verbose in cp-demangle.c defaults to 0, so the two
> functions are demangled identically.  I think this is wrong, and have
> changed flag_verbose to 1 for my own use.  What do other people think?

Strongly agree.  I was boggled to find two names for obviously
different constructors that were demangled to the same thing; after
figuring out what all the different variants were, of course, it made
sense - but it violates least surprise quite badly.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-12-04 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-04  1:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-12-04  5:27 ` Jason Merrill
2001-12-04  7:40   ` Daniel Berlin
2001-12-04  8:58   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
     [not found] <20011203154836.A28821@nevyn.them.org>
2001-12-03 13:52 ` Jason Merrill
2001-12-03 14:29   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-03 14:58     ` Jason Merrill
2001-12-03 15:25       ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-04  8:25         ` Jason Merrill
2001-12-04  8:53           ` Jim Blandy
2001-12-04  9:43             ` Joe Buck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011204115920.A8635@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=mec@shout.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).