From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12643 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2001 19:46:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12446 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 19:46:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mel-rti21.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.19.94) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2001 19:46:42 -0000 Received: from citronier.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.222) by mel-rti21.wanadoo.fr; 4 Dec 2001 20:46:34 +0100 Received: from ulmo.localdomain (193.251.50.176) by citronier.wanadoo.fr; 4 Dec 2001 20:44:04 +0100 Received: (from guerby@localhost) by ulmo.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fB4JaiY29839; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:36:44 +0100 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 11:46:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200112041936.fB4JaiY29839@ulmo.localdomain> X-Authentication-Warning: ulmo.localdomain: guerby set sender to guerby@acm.org using -f From: To: jsm28@cam.ac.uk CC: zack@codesourcery.com, bosch@gnat.com, minyard@acm.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: (jsm28@cam.ac.uk) Subject: Re: Ada build now requires gnatmake? Reply-to: guerby@acm.org References: X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 > I thought that the generated files were now mentioned in > contrib/gcc_update, so if you update with that or use contrib/gcc_update > --touch after updating you shouldn't see the problem. You'll get not-in-synch generated files, so you'll probably either won't be able to build or build a non-functional compiler. It is my understanding that gcc_update is intended just to make sure timestamp are rights before making a release tarball, but it can't make sure sources are right :). -- Laurent Guerby