From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42242-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6156 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2001 22:09:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6117 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 22:09:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2001 22:09:35 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id A750DF28AD; Tue,  4 Dec 2001 17:08:50 -0500 (EST)
From: dewar@gnat.com
To: fw@deneb.enyo.de, guerby@acm.org
Subject: Re: [Ada] new "-margs" flag to gnatmake
Cc: ebert@bms.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20011204220850.A750DF28AD@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 14:09:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2

I agree that -margs is a reasonable idea