From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42258-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28518 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2001 00:37:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28054 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 00:35:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.uni-kl.de) (131.246.137.52)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 00:35:56 -0000
Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de (aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.3])
	by mail.uni-kl.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id fB50Zsq08109;
	Wed, 5 Dec 2001 01:35:54 +0100 (MET)
Received: from rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de ([131.246.178.123] helo=matrix)
	by aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2)
	id 16BQ2U-000ixk-00; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 01:35:54 +0100
Received: by matrix (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386), from userid 1024)
	id 3898031A77A; Wed,  5 Dec 2001 01:35:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 16:37:00 -0000
From: Dirk Mueller <dmuell@gmx.net>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.COM>
Cc: Waldo Bastian <bastian@kde.org>, kde-core-devel@mail.kde.org,
   gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: KDE hackers, please read (was [nathan@codesourcery.com: Re: GCC 3.0.3: Bugs to Fix]) (fwd)
Message-ID: <20011205013551.A8087@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de>
References: <200112042117.fB4LHCl03492@linux.local> <200112042250.OAA02613@atrus.synopsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200112042250.OAA02613@atrus.synopsys.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2

On Die, 04 Dez 2001, Joe Buck wrote:

> But that causes an interesting problem.  You say that you don't want to
> use RTLD_GLOBAL because someone might duplicate a class name (say,
> "DisplayList").  Of course, this violates the one-definition rule, but
> let's ignore that for a moment.

Point taken for the RTLD_GLOBAL part, but why do we need RTLD_NOW in order 
to make RTTI work, as the original posting pointed out ?

I think lazy symbol resolving is the least thing an ABI should be capable of 
when living in the 21th century..


Dirk