From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42315-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9976 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2001 23:43:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9675 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 23:42:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dot.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.224)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 23:42:45 -0000
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by dot.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fB5NgbE08878;
	Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:42:37 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: dot.cygnus.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 15:43:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: problems debugging gcc
Message-ID: <20011205154236.A8874@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>,
	Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
References: <200112041958.LAA06265@kankakee.wrs.com> <20011204203454.A20475@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <jmwv02zksp.fsf@geoffk.org> <20011204223213.A23655@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <200112042325.PAA32650@geoffk.org> <20011204233807.A24275@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20011204233807.A24275@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>; from neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 11:38:07PM +0000
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 11:38:07PM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> Instead of adding a filename component and taking up more memory,
> would it be too much to switch to using a single lineno and using the
> line maps to imply the file name?

This seems like a fine idea.


r~