From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2473 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2001 00:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2001 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 00:41:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dot.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.224) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 00:41:28 -0000 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fB60bax08908; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:37:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.cygnus.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:42:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Richard Kenner Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Failing G++ tests on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0c. Message-ID: <20011205163736.E8874@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Richard Kenner , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <10112052325.AA26526@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <10112052325.AA26526@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>; from kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu on Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:25:06PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:25:06PM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote: > I also get about a half dozen loader warnings about missing strong > symbols for a sizable fraction of tests, but they don't fail. Ignore these. This is due to a difference of opinion about how Compaq implemented weak symbols. I really wish there were an easy way to get the linker to not warn about this. r~