From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42291-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28978 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2001 18:22:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28941 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 18:22:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO kiruna.synopsys.com) (204.176.20.18)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 18:22:43 -0000
Received: from crone.synopsys.com (crone.synopsys.com [146.225.7.23])
	by kiruna.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B0D65F2B8; Wed,  5 Dec 2001 10:22:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atrus.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by crone.synopsys.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA09037;
	Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:22:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.COM>
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
	by atrus.synopsys.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id KAA21662;
	Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200112051822.KAA21662@atrus.synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: build status page problem
To: janis187@us.ibm.com (Janis Johnson)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 10:22:00 -0000
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20011205101954.A1968@us.ibm.com> from "Janis Johnson" at Dec 05, 2001 10:19:54 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2

I wrote:
> > I have an issue with
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/buildstat.html.
> > 
> > No distinction is made between 3.0, 3.0.1, and 3.0.2, and it's possible
> > that an unnoticed regression might mean that, say, 3.0.1 builds on some
> > obscure platform but 3.0.2 does not.  We need to include the actual
> > release number, there is no such thing as "3.0.x".

Janis wrote:
> The assumption is that everything on the GCC 3.0 build status page
> builds with all releases of 3.0.x unless it says otherwise.  So far
> there's only one note otherwise, for s390-linux-gnu which is supported
> beginning with 3.0.1.

Sorry if this sounds like I'm picking on you ...

But how are you assuring this?  Do you have three success reports for each
platform listed?  (one each for 3.0, 3.0.1, and 3.0.2)?  When 3.0.3 is
released, will you then be sure to have four success reports for each?