From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31317 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2001 20:57:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31283 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 20:57:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO magnolia.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.19.62) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 20:57:26 -0000 Received: from mel-rta8.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.79) by magnolia.wanadoo.fr; 5 Dec 2001 21:57:07 +0100 Received: from ulmo.localdomain (193.251.50.176) by mel-rta8.wanadoo.fr; 5 Dec 2001 21:54:32 +0100 Received: (from guerby@localhost) by ulmo.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fB5Kkvb19044; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:46:57 +0100 Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 12:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200112052046.fB5Kkvb19044@ulmo.localdomain> X-Authentication-Warning: ulmo.localdomain: guerby set sender to guerby@acm.org using -f From: To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org CC: nickc@cambridge.redhat.com, dj@redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: symlink-tree adoption effective Reply-to: guerby@acm.org X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2 Nick commited the symlink-tree and MAINTAINERS patch to src, so I assume gcc is now the master copy of symlink-tree and the file is currently the same in both trees. (No reactions from autoconf people.) Future patches to symlink-tree should be proposed to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org for approval as documented by src MAINTAINERS and both versions should be kept in sync. -- Laurent Guerby