From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20560 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2001 01:12:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20523 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 01:12:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 01:12:01 -0000 Received: from greed.delorie.com (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA11385; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:11:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fB719IS32243; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:09:18 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 17:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200112070109.fB719IS32243@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: echristo@redhat.com CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <1007680473.22703.18.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> (message from Eric Christopher on 06 Dec 2001 15:14:32 -0800) Subject: Re: More code removal, mips ecoff support References: <1007680473.22703.18.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00338.txt.bz2 > I'm looking at current OSs that support ecoff on mips or any objections > to removing the ecoff support from the backend. Anyone? Windows CE on mips is coff/PE (not ecoff) so please be careful.