From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42405-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31876 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2001 01:38:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31854 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 01:38:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 01:38:47 -0000
Received: from nile.gnat.com ([205.232.38.5])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 16C9yR-00015q-00
	for <gcc@gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Dec 2001 20:38:47 -0500
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id 0F453F28CB; Thu,  6 Dec 2001 20:38:03 -0500 (EST)
From: dewar@gnat.com
To: dalej@apple.com, dweekly@legato.com
Subject: Re: -Wignored-returns?
Cc: gcc@gnu.org
Message-Id: <20011207013803.0F453F28CB@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 17:48:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00341.txt.bz2

<That's fair. Should the issue be taken up again, then? It would be a very
useful feature for us.
>

So why not submit a proposed patch?