From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42468-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2943 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2001 01:40:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2922 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2001 01:40:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2001 01:40:39 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id BD26EF28C6; Fri,  7 Dec 2001 20:39:54 -0500 (EST)
From: dewar@gnat.com
To: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu, zack@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: ACATS legal status cleared by FSF
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20011208013954.BD26EF28C6@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:59:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2

<<One possibility is to run the B tests in a non-conventional way, where all
the test harness does is to check for the presence of at least one
error line for each line marked ERROR.  I don't know how hard such a
harness is to write, and that's not the way B tests are usually done, but
might work.
>>

That's not good enough, the errors often do not occur on exactly the correct
lines.