From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5397 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2001 20:57:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4304 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 20:56:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dot.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.224) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 20:56:18 -0000 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fBAKuCE23751; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:56:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.cygnus.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:03:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Linus Torvalds Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't work Message-ID: <20011210125611.A23739@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Linus Torvalds , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20011210005444.A23367@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:03:09AM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00543.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:03:09AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > These days libgcc has a _lot_ of "non-architecture" stuff. But it's still all "compiler support" routines. > Read my email again. Read the part about why we do not want to have the > slow crap routines, when most likely the user really _wanted_ a unsigned > shift in the first place. As stated, that sounds reasonable. Just so long as it's not automatically considered a compiler bug that you run in to these things from time to time. r~