From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42588-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18693 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2001 19:31:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18637 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 19:31:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO boden.synopsys.com) (204.176.20.19)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 19:31:40 -0000
Received: from crone.synopsys.com (crone.synopsys.com [146.225.7.23])
	by boden.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9D683DB06; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:31:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atrus.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by crone.synopsys.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA14827;
	Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:31:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.COM>
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
	by atrus.synopsys.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id LAA17422;
	Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200112101931.LAA17422@atrus.synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't
To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:35:00 -0000
Cc: pkoning@equallogic.com (Paul Koning), gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112100942230.14166-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> from "Linus Torvalds" at Dec 10, 2001 09:47:51 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00524.txt.bz2

Linus writes:
> Gcc doesn't support inline functions without optimization (it does in C++,
> and it may be that even the C side has started to honour the "inline"
> keyword, but I've never been interested enough to check), and Linux has
> always tended to prefer inline functions over complicated macros.

No, even in C++ GCC does not inline functions without optimization.