From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22974 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2001 22:12:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22930 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 22:12:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mel-rto1.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.19.188) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 22:12:28 -0000 Received: from amyris.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.150) by mel-rto1.wanadoo.fr; 10 Dec 2001 23:12:28 +0100 Received: from ulmo.localdomain (193.251.50.176) by amyris.wanadoo.fr; 10 Dec 2001 23:12:15 +0100 Received: (from guerby@localhost) by ulmo.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBAM3ao03200; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 23:03:36 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:31:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200112102203.fBAM3ao03200@ulmo.localdomain> X-Authentication-Warning: ulmo.localdomain: guerby set sender to guerby@acm.org using -f From: To: charlet@ACT-Europe.FR CC: jbuck@synopsys.COM, torvalds@transmeta.com, pkoning@equallogic.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <20011210225929.B25977@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> (message from Arnaud Charlet on Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:59:29 +0100) Subject: Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't Reply-to: guerby@acm.org References: <200112101931.LAA17422@atrus.synopsys.com> <200112102132.fBALW5L02834@ulmo.localdomain> <20011210225929.B25977@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00558.txt.bz2 > The front end inlining mechanism is supposed to take care of this. but > there are still some subtle issues that prevent it from working properly. > Anyway, the documentation should not be fixed, since the intent is definitely > to always inline. If I understand correctly, Inline_Always not inlining at -O0 is considered a bug. Any available test case or description for the subtle issues you mention? -- Laurent Guerby