From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30584 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2001 17:40:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29517 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2001 17:39:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dot.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.224) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2001 17:39:18 -0000 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.cygnus.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBDHdGZ06827; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:39:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.cygnus.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:49:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Arnaud Charlet Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Use of -fPIC on Tru64 Message-ID: <20011213093916.C6807@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Arnaud Charlet , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20011213102908.B10630@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <20011213014003.C1122@redhat.com> <20011213104446.A14306@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <20011213092349.A6807@redhat.com> <20011213182709.A13481@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011213182709.A13481@dublin.int.act-europe.fr>; from charlet@ACT-Europe.FR on Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:27:09PM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00703.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:27:09PM +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > From what you said, -fPIC on Tru64 only changes behavior of functions > inside the same object. Why do functions inside same objects for libgcc need > to be compiled with -fPIC ? That does not seem necessary to me. Really I don't think it matters one way or another. I'd rather treat Tru64 just like every other platform and use -fPIC. r~