From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1460 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2001 21:04:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1395 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2001 21:04:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e31.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.129) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2001 21:04:49 -0000 Received: from westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.24]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA64264; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:01:43 -0500 Received: from gateway.beaverton.ibm.com (gateway.beaverton.ibm.com [138.95.180.1]) by westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.01) with ESMTP id fBDL4Bf24012; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:04:11 -0700 Received: from eng2.beaverton.ibm.com (eng2.beaverton.ibm.com [138.95.200.91]) by gateway.beaverton.ibm.com (8.10.0.Beta10/8.11.2) with ESMTP id fBDL46V11038; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:04:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from dyn9-47-18-192.des.beaverton.ibm.com (dyn9-47-18-192.des.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.18.192]) by eng2.beaverton.ibm.com (8.10.0.Beta10/8.8.5/token.aware-1.2) with ESMTP id fBDL45Q02464; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:04:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from janis@localhost) by dyn9-47-18-192.des.beaverton.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA12631; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:07:27 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:15:00 -0000 From: Janis Johnson To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Janis Johnson , Joe Buck , Gcc k6 testing account , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Zack Weinberg Subject: Re: Build status page:Succes and failures. Message-ID: <20011213130727.A12581@us.ibm.com> References: <20011212103425.A1741@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:26:34PM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00727.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:26:34PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > P.S. What's the tool that's supposed to be used now to check the > > validity of html files? > > Personally, I mostly use validator.w3.org. IIRC Zack had a nice > description on how to perform such a test which was part of a larger > patch which required some splitting and I believe he didn't have the > time to commit this part yet... OK, I found Zack's description in the gcc-patches archives. The file is clean, although Zack's patch contains an extraneous semicolon in the html command to use: +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en"> ^ here Janis