From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42946-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29909 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2001 01:52:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29773 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2001 01:51:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO caip.rutgers.edu) (128.6.236.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 01:51:14 -0000
Received: (from ghazi@localhost)
	by caip.rutgers.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA01430;
	Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:51:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:59:00 -0000
From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
Message-Id: <200112170151.UAA01430@caip.rutgers.edu>
To: neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Strange sign-compare results
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00882.txt.bz2

 > From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
 > 
 > neil wrote:-
 > 
 > > The others convert the unsigned operand to signed, and therefore the
 > > result of the subtraction is signed.
 > 
 > Ignore that last sentence; I didn't read your examples closely enough
 > 8-)
 > Neil.

I'm not sure what you mean then.  Would you say the behavior I
observed is a bug or feature?

		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Internet Solutions