From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42949-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6990 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2001 03:55:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6968 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2001 03:55:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO igw3.watson.ibm.com) (198.81.209.18)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 03:55:28 -0000
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57])
	by igw3.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fBH3tLn27178;
	Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:55:21 -0500
Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144])
	by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fBH3tLn31130;
	Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:55:21 -0500
Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/01-10-2000) with ESMTP id WAA22768;
	Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:55:21 -0500
Message-Id: <200112170355.WAA22768@makai.watson.ibm.com>
To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
cc: gcc external <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS 
In-Reply-To: Message from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> 
   of "16 Dec 2001 19:50:37 PST." <1008561037.20065.344.camel@litecycle.cc.andrews.edu> 
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:04:00 -0000
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00885.txt.bz2

>>>>> Aldy Hernandez writes:

Aldy> is there a reason why NON_SPECIAL_REGS is not the exact bit opposite of
Aldy> SPECIAL_REGS?

Aldy> { 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0x00000008, 0x00000000 }, /* NON_SPECIAL_REGS */ \

Aldy> { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000007, 0x00000000 }, /* SPECIAL_REGS */     \

	Because the name is not accurate?  It really is the union of
GENERAL_REGS and FLOAT_REGS.

David