From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4424 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2001 07:28:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4380 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2001 07:28:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.demon.co.uk) (158.152.184.26) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 07:28:10 -0000 Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16FsCr-00059M-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 07:29:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 00:02:00 -0000 From: Neil Booth To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Strange sign-compare results Message-ID: <20011217072900.A19543@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> References: <200112170151.UAA01430@caip.rutgers.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200112170151.UAA01430@caip.rutgers.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00891.txt.bz2 Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:- > I'm not sure what you mean then. Would you say the behavior I > observed is a bug or feature? It is the behaviour the C standard requires. Neil.