From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25014 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2001 21:21:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23843 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2001 21:20:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dot.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.224) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 21:20:12 -0000 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.cygnus.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBHLJYi15654; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:19:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.cygnus.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:28:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Mark Mitchell Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Freeze timing and questions Message-ID: <20011217131934.A15651@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Mark Mitchell , "Joseph S. Myers" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" References: <52450000.1008613764@gandalf.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <52450000.1008613764@gandalf.codesourcery.com>; from mark@codesourcery.com on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:29:24AM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00939.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:29:24AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > (a) What's the exact time of the transition to Phase 3 (feature freeze)? > > 11:59 PM, GMT -0800, Monday, Dec 17. 2001. Due to patch review backlog, I think that anything posted to gcc-patches before last Friday should be given a fair chance. That said, these leftovers should be addressed promptly, and if someone has one outstanding they should send prodding mail. Does this seem reasonable? r~