From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
To: dan@dberlin.org, dewar@gnat.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu
Subject: Re: g++ and aliasing bools
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020125161103.3F2CEF28D1@nile.gnat.com> (raw)
<<I've been told i need to come up with a formal proof that given certain
relationships between C++ types, that may-alias is always determinable
statically correctly, or that we always correctly determine that we can't
determine it (IE never claim wrong that things may not alias).
I've said before, and i'll say again, that i'm not going to do that.
>>
THat's fine, but the fact that you are not going to do it does not mean
that it is not desirable or not necessary!
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-25 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-25 8:35 Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-01-25 8:54 ` Daniel Berlin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-25 14:49 mike stump
2002-01-25 12:23 Robert Dewar
2002-01-25 13:29 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 12:06 mike stump
2002-01-25 9:13 Robert Dewar
2002-01-25 8:55 Robert Dewar
2002-01-25 9:21 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 10:00 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 10:54 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-25 11:37 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 11:45 ` David Edelsohn
2002-01-25 11:53 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 12:09 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-25 12:28 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-25 13:49 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-25 14:19 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 14:21 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-25 15:41 ` Neil Booth
2002-01-25 16:04 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 17:37 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-25 18:10 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-27 5:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-27 5:34 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-28 10:39 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-28 10:51 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-28 15:59 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-28 17:11 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-28 17:28 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-28 18:14 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-28 17:18 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-28 18:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-28 18:50 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-28 19:33 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-28 17:40 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-28 21:55 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-28 22:02 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-01-28 22:12 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-25 13:07 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 15:43 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 16:03 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 15:13 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 12:10 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-25 13:16 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 15:23 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 12:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-25 22:14 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-26 3:46 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-25 8:33 Richard Kenner
2002-01-25 8:32 Robert Dewar
2002-01-25 8:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 9:39 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 8:28 Robert Dewar
2002-01-25 8:49 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 7:51 Robert Dewar
2002-01-25 8:18 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 8:20 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 7:38 Robert Dewar
2002-01-25 8:11 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 14:09 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-01-25 7:30 Richard Kenner
2002-01-25 7:30 Richard Kenner
2002-01-25 7:33 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 15:43 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 7:23 Richard Kenner
2002-01-25 7:24 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 7:05 Richard Kenner
2002-01-25 8:59 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-24 16:09 Richard Kenner
2002-01-24 15:30 Richard Kenner
2002-01-25 2:16 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-01-25 3:04 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-25 4:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-01-25 4:35 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-25 6:34 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 7:17 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 13:57 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-01-25 14:47 ` Tim Hollebeek
2002-01-23 17:56 Dan Nicolaescu
2002-01-23 18:27 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-23 18:48 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2002-01-23 19:16 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-24 14:15 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-24 14:16 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-24 14:27 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-24 14:35 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-24 15:06 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-24 15:08 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-24 15:18 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2002-01-24 15:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-25 2:25 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-25 15:48 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2002-01-25 20:22 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-25 23:59 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-27 17:04 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2002-01-27 17:59 ` Paolo Carlini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020125161103.3F2CEF28D1@nile.gnat.com \
--to=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=dan@dberlin.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).