From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19534 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2002 03:24:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19503 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2002 03:24:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2002 03:24:03 -0000 Received: from greed.delorie.com (cse.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA19903; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0S3O0p08776; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:24:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 23:50:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200201280324.g0S3O0p08776@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Nathanael Nerode on Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:57:27 -0500 (EST)) Subject: Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted References: X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg01775.txt.bz2 > My next patch is to autoconfiscate the remainder of the 'utils' > directory. It *looks* like this is part of GDB, and so should be > submitted to gdb-patches -- is this correct? It's probably the best place to start.