From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1225 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2002 22:25:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1186 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 22:25:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wrs.com) (147.11.1.11) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2002 22:25:06 -0000 Received: from kankakee.wrs.com (kankakee [147.11.37.13]) by mail.wrs.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA08534; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:23:41 -0800 (PST) From: mike stump Received: (from mrs@localhost) by kankakee.wrs.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.0) id OAA05137; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:25:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200201302225.OAA05137@kankakee.wrs.com> To: echristo@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, toddm@fullplaymedia.com Subject: RE: mips structure padding X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg01954.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:28:37 -0800 > From: "Todd Malsbary" > To: "Eric Christopher" , > i've attached a testcase that i reduced as much as possible from the > ecos sources. I cannot tell if it is a bug. Someone that knows the C++ abi inside and out would have to comment on it. It seems like it should be a bug. I'd probably file it as a bug report (against the C++ abi), though, they might reject it later for not being a bug. I can't help but point out that I don't like your sources. What is compatible, is when the same exact text, character for character is shown to both compilers, certainly that isn't the case in the code you present. :-(