From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
To: dewar@gnat.com, gdr@codesourcery.com
Cc: aoliva@redhat.com, coola@ngs.ru, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, pcarlini@unitus.it
Subject: Re: a warning to implement
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 10:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020203142004.2EAB5F28F3@nile.gnat.com> (raw)
<Well, that construct have been debated to death in the C++ committee.
And given the length of the debate and the opinions expressed there I
would certainly *not* characterize it as obviously dubious. I would
object to have it enabled by -Wall.
>
What possible useful semantic meaning can this statement have? I can see
a debate in the C++ committee as to whether it should be legal or not (that's
quite a subtle issue, and indeed could be expected to generate debate), but
I can't imagine a debate over whether it is useful or not. So I see no basis
for your objection.
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-03 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-03 10:52 Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-02-04 21:36 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-11 7:30 Robert Dewar
2002-02-11 7:13 Robert Dewar
2002-02-11 6:53 Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-02-11 7:19 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-11 7:44 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-02-11 9:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-11 10:07 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-11 10:19 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-08 9:46 Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-02-08 13:33 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-10 7:50 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-02-08 8:23 Robert Dewar
2002-02-08 9:09 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-08 6:57 Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-02-08 8:21 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 13:55 mike stump
2002-02-06 13:02 Robert Dewar
2002-02-07 10:51 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 12:29 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 12:35 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 12:04 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 12:22 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-06 12:32 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 12:51 ` Jason Riedy
2002-02-06 9:03 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 9:19 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 8:40 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 8:29 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 8:29 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 8:38 ` Nathan Sidwell
2002-02-06 8:50 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 8:03 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 7:51 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 6:56 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 8:01 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 6:35 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 2:00 Jeremy Sanders
2002-02-06 0:03 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 10:50 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-06 11:44 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 11:47 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-05 20:27 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 20:16 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 21:00 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-06 10:51 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-06 14:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-06 14:57 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-05 20:12 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 20:07 Robert Dewar
2002-02-06 11:06 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-05 19:26 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 19:24 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 17:04 Richard Almquist
2002-02-05 15:55 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 16:58 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-05 14:23 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 15:00 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-05 14:14 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 14:47 ` Michael Matz
2002-02-05 15:40 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 4:24 ` Richard Sandiford
2002-02-06 4:51 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 5:55 ` Richard Sandiford
2002-02-06 6:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 7:56 ` Kevin Handy
2002-02-06 2:08 ` Akim Demaille
2002-02-06 7:37 ` Akim Demaille
2002-02-05 14:12 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 9:31 Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-02-05 9:44 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-05 10:09 ` Tim Hollebeek
2002-02-05 10:42 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-05 11:52 ` Tim Hollebeek
2002-02-05 14:48 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-05 13:52 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-05 14:10 ` Tim Hollebeek
2002-02-05 14:29 ` Stephano Mariani
2002-02-05 14:38 ` Tim Hollebeek
2002-02-05 14:53 ` Stephano Mariani
2002-02-05 18:46 ` Joe Buck
2002-02-05 14:48 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-05 15:03 ` Phil Edwards
2002-02-05 15:43 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 9:14 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2002-02-06 9:20 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-06 9:23 ` Phil Edwards
2002-02-06 2:12 ` Daniel Egger
2002-02-05 5:12 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 8:21 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-05 4:33 Robert Dewar
2002-02-05 8:49 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-03 10:52 Robert Dewar
2002-02-02 18:02 Robert Dewar
2002-02-02 18:46 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-02 16:09 Robert Dewar
2002-02-02 17:00 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-03 10:52 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-02-02 2:45 Paolo Carlini
2002-02-02 16:05 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-03 10:52 ` Andrey R. Urazov
2002-02-03 10:52 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-02-03 10:52 ` Andrey R. Urazov
2002-02-02 1:26 Andrey R. Urazov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020203142004.2EAB5F28F3@nile.gnat.com \
--to=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=coola@ngs.ru \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdr@codesourcery.com \
--cc=pcarlini@unitus.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).