From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-45932-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9741 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2002 14:24:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9654 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2002 14:23:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2002 14:23:59 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id C1976F28C9; Wed,  6 Feb 2002 09:23:58 -0500 (EST)
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, jss@ast.cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: a warning to implement
Message-Id: <20020206142358.C1976F28C9@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 06:35:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2

<<So it looks like there is divine permission for a warning :-)  (yes I know
Bjarne is not the standard).
>>

No, but one can hadly fault his reasonable statement here, which is a nice
summing up of this strange thread.